Disclaimer: This is a personal blog. The views and opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of any institutions or organizations that I currently work for or have worked for. Follow me on twitter here

Sunday, May 8, 2011

Lessons learned from data breaches

More information here

Password Manager "LastPass" Users must change master passwords -- but not all right now

Here is another breach . . .

"The "last password you'll ever need" now requires a reset: LastPass is forcing users of the password manager service to change the single master password they created for accessing websites, virtual private networks, and Web mail accounts via the tool. The move comes in response to the company's discovery of unusual network activity around one of its databases. "

More information here

(Source: DarkReading)

Wednesday, May 4, 2011

Self-encrypting drives most effective against data breaches

This is actually very interesting data results. Though, how much would it cost?

"With more than 82 percent of respondents reporting one or more data breaches, a new Ponemon Institute study on self-encrypting drives found that 70 percent believed that self-encrypting drives “would have had an enormous and positive impact on the protection of sensitive and confidential data.”


Data breaches cost about $214 U.S. per lost record or about $7.2 million per incident.

Ponemon’s study interviewed 517 IT practitioners in financial services, the public sector, retailing, healthcare, technology and other fields who were familiar with self-encrypting drives (SEDs).

SEDs automatically and continuously encrypt data in the drive, with most SEDs today based on a TCG specification. The study found that with software-based encryption, 40 percent of employees regularly turn it off without permission, thereby leaving data unprotected.

IT practitioners rated performance and ease of deployment as the most important aspects of encryption solutions. Sixty-four percent agreed that SEDs provide a faster set-up time, and 59 percent agreed that SEDs provide enhanced scalability in multi-drive situations.

In addition to data breach protection, respondents noted that compliance with state or federal data protection laws is the main driver for encrypting data at rest, including financial documents, employee records and customer data. Respondents note that the types of data that they encrypt include:

* 89 percent: confidential (57 percent) and non-confidential (32 percent) financial documents
* 52 percent: trade secrets (34 percent) and intellectual property (18 percent)
* 41 percent: employee records
* 39 percent: customer data.

“While self-encrypting drives are a new technology, the IT staff we interviewed believed they are more secure than software-based encryption,” noted Dr. Ponemon. “And it’s apparent that complying with the increasing number of state and federal data protection mandates is driving encryption and interest in SEDs.”"

(Source: HelpNet Security)

Apple iOS 4.3.3 Released

"The iOS 4.3.3 software update is now available via iTunes.

It contains changes to the iOS crowd-sourced location database cache including:

* Reduces the size of the cache
* No longer backs the cache up to iTunes
* Deletes the cache entirely when Location Services is turned off.

Products compatible with this software update:

* iPhone 4 (GSM model)
* iPhone 3GS
* iPad 2
* iPad
* iPod touch (4th generation)
* iPod touch (3rd generation)."

(Source: HelpNet Security)

Tuesday, May 3, 2011

24.6 million Sony Online Entertainment accounts stolen

"Sony's ongoing investigation of illegal intrusions into Sony Online Entertainment systems revealed that attackers may have stolen personal information from approximately 24.6 million SOE accounts, as well as certain information from an outdated database from 2007.

The information from the outdated database that may have been stolen includes approximately 12,700 non-U.S. credit or debit card numbers and expiration dates (but not credit card security codes), and about 10,700 direct debit records of certain customers in Austria, Germany, Netherlands and Spain.

With the current outage of the PlayStation Network and Qriocity services and the ongoing investigation into the recent attacks, SOE had also undertaken an intensive investigation into its system. Upon discovery of this additional information, the company promptly shut down all servers related to SOE services while continuing to review and upgrade all of its online security systems in the face of these unprecedented cyber-attacks.

The company is working with the FBI and continuing its own full investigation while working to restore all services.

The personal information of the approximately 24.6 million SOE accounts that was illegally obtained, to the extent it had been provided to SOE, is as follows:

* name
* address
* e-mail address
* birthdate
* gender
* phone number
* login name
* hashed password.

In addition to the information above, the 10,700 direct debit records from accounts in Austria, Germany, Netherlands and Spain, include:

* bank account number
* customer name
* account name
* customer address.

SOE will grant customers 30 days of additional time on their subscriptions, in addition to compensating them one day for each day the system is down. It is also in the process of outlining a "make good" plan for its PlayStation 3 MMOs. "

(HelpNet Security)

Monday, May 2, 2011

Osama bin Laden spam invades Facebook

"Please make sure that your computer is up to date with all the security patches, that your antivirus is updated and if you do click on the links from Facebook and other social media pages, make sure that you don’t give out any important information (username, passwords).



Since the bad guys seem to be taking advantage of this opportunity quite heavily, we expect to see more malicious code getting triggered by the death of Osama bin Laden."

(HelpNet Security)

Sunday, May 1, 2011

Researchers crack Nikon image authentication system

This is a very interesting article since it is now possible to produce changed images with valid digital signatures using the exploits. This will also be interesting for forensic examiners as well.

"Credibility of photographic evidence may be extremely important in a variety of situations. Courts, news agencies and insurance companies may accept digitally signed photographs as valid evidence. If such evidence is forged, consequences can be severe. The most famous fakes include cases of fraud committed by enthusiast photographers, photo journalists, editors, political parties, and even the US Army.



ElcomSoft researched Nikon’s Image Authentication System, a secure suite validating if an image has been altered since capture, and discovered a major vulnerability in the manner the secure image signing key is being handled. In turn, this allowed the company to extract the original signing key from a Nikon camera.

The vulnerability, when exploited, makes it possible to produce manipulated images with a fully valid authentication signature. ElcomSoft was able to successfully extract the original image signing key and produce a set of forged images that successfully pass validation with Nikon Image Authentication Software.

When designing a digital security system, it is essential to equally and properly implement all parts of the system. The entire system is only as secure as its weakest link. In the case of Nikon’s Image Authentication System, the company has not done at least one thing right.

The ultimate vulnerability lies in the way the image signing key is being handled. As the signing cryptographic key is handled inappropriately, it can be extracted from the camera. After obtaining the signing key, one can use it to sign any picture, whether or not it’s been altered, edited, or even computer-generated. The signed image will then successfully pass as a valid, genuine piece when verified by Nikon Image Authentication Software.

The vulnerability exists in all current Nikon cameras supporting Nikon Image Authentication, including Nikon D3X, D3, D700, D300S, D300, D2Xs, D2X, D2Hs, and D200 digital SLRs.

ElcomSoft has notified CERT and Nikon about the issue, and prepared a set of digitally manipulated images passing as originals when verified with Nikon’s secure authentication software. Nikon has provided no response nor expressed any interest in the existence of the issue."

(From HelpNet Security)